LIKE SEVERAL OTHER writers, I watch both Nokia and Motorola produce mass market products. I also watch the end results and know that it will be a strange occasion to discover Motorola vanquishing Nokia in any mobile telephony segment. I think it's down to one core reason: Nokia does phones well and Motorola does wireless infrastructure well. Market results seem to suggest you cannot top both categories at the same time. Nokia has the mobile phone market, selling more than one billion phones to date.
I kick around with the Nokia N70 in the photo. My cat likes it better than any other phone I've owned. I have owned several Nokia handsets costing more than EUR 500 each. I made my decisions based on form factor and business usage requirements. Motorola products didn't even make the short list. I've owned several Motorola phones. One had the most durable finish I've seen for pub operations--you could slide it across the floor, through the Guinness and under the feet of a nearby table and it still held its connection. Another was a EUR 400 fashion statement that my dog ate one evening. But every year, I buy Nokia phones because they fit my needs best. And I know friends with different needs that buy Nokia as well since Nokia's lineup of phones fills complete walls of many Irish mobile phone shops.
I've visited Helsinki and walked the Nokia campus. The place oozes with trendy things and if you avoid getting clipped by the ruthless cyclists, you will see the secret Nokia sauce. It is Nokia's supply-chain management. Nokia's logistical processes pummel the rest of the competition.